EDUCATIONAL REASON IN THE AGE OF NETWORK RATIONALITY: REINTERPRETATION OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT FOR DIGITAL EDUCATION PROJECT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/NPU-VOU.2025.3(98).09Keywords:
educational mind, networked rationality, IT education, networked society, digital education, reflexivityAbstract
The article proposes a reinterpretation of the educational ideal of the autonomy of reason in the coordinates of the network rationality of digital education, focusing on the context of the war against Ukraine and largescale migrations of students. It is shown that network platforms simultaneously expand access to knowledge and generate new asymmetries of visibility, fragmentation of attention and algorithmic biases that undermine publicity and strengthen the instrumentalization of learning. In response, a theoretical and practical framework is proposed that shifts the focus from content accumulation to reflective judgment that can operate in conditions of uncertainty, information overload, and psychological vulnerability. The novelty lies in the triad model “Reflexivity – Publicity – Accountability”, which combines individual critical thinking with cultures of reasoned discussion and transparent institutional procedures.Reflexivity is interpreted as the ability to distinguish knowledge from noise, read algorithmic environments, and meaningfully use AI as a tool to support judgment. Publicity is defined as a space of mutual recognition and inclusive participation, where multilingual and trauma laden audiences are provided with safe channels for discussion and joint problemsolving.Accountability is described as a set of rules that ensure explainability of algorithms, ethical data policies, and fair assessment practices, including for displaced students. Methodologically, the article is based on the integration of philosophy of education, axiology and criticism of digital technologies and offers operational guidelines for schools and universities: slow reading, source discipline, mixed public platforms, open assessment rubrics and protocols for the use of AI. It is concluded that the synchronized action of the triad creates the conditions for continuous educational resilience, in which the mind retains the ability to make fair and responsible judgments even in crisis regimes.
References
Андрущенко, В. П. (2025). Просвітницька одіссея розуму. Київ : Знання України, 524 с.
Андрущенко, Т. І., Андрущенко, Т. В., & Ващенко, К. (2023). Філософія культури як системна парадигма сучасної освіти. Міждисциплінарні дослідження складних систем. № 22. С. 77–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.31392/iscs. 2023.22.077
Д’юї, Д. (2003). Демократія і освіта; пер. М. Олійник, І. Босак, Г. Пехник. Львів : Літопис. 294 с.
Кастельс, М. (2007). Інтернет-галактика. Міркування щодо Інтернету, бізнесу і суспільства. Київ : Ваклер, 304 с.
Кравченко, Т. О. (2014). Аксіологічний аспект інформаційно-мережевої парадигми. Філософія науки: традиції та інновації. № 1 (9). С. 53–63.
Терепищий, С. О. (2016). Сучасні освітні ландшафти. Київ : Фенікс. 309 с.
Bradley, L., Bahous, R., & Albasha, A. (2020). Professional development of Syrian refugee women: Proceeding with a career within education. Studies in Continuing Education, 44(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1840342
Butson, R., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2024). AI and its implications for research in higher education: A critical dialogue. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(3), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2280200
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: The State of the Field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8.
Herbst, M., & Sitek, M. (2023). Education in exile: Ukrainian refugee students in the schooling system in Poland following the Russian–Ukrainian war. European Journal of Education, 58(4), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12587
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., & Holstein, K. (2022). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 32. P. 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.
Jędryka, B. (2023). Nauczanie języka polskiego jako obcego w edukacji wczesnoszkolnej na przykładzie uczniów uchodźców z Ukrainy – zarys problematyki. Edukacja Elementarna w Teorii i Praktyce, 18 (3/70), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.35765/eetp.2023.1870.07
Jireček, M., Bednář, M., & Moravec, J. (2023). Ukrajinští žáci na českých školách a dějepis – vybrané výsledky dotazníkového šetření. Dějiny a dějepis, 37 (1–2). https://doi.org/10.5817/DD2023-1-2-2
Koterwas, A., & Nowosielska, E. (2025). Teachers’ and principals’ experiences with assessing Ukrainian students in Polish schools. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 14(1(27)), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2025.1427.02.
Lisowska, K., & Łojko, M. (2022). “Under the common roof”. Cultural adaptation of children from Ukraine in Poland. Case study. Problemy Opiekuńczo-Wychowawcze, 614(9), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1279
Młynek, K., & Andruszkiewicz, A. (2023). Funkcjonowanie społeczne dzieci- migrantów w polskiej szkole w opinii rodziców i dyrektorów szkół podstawowych [Social functioning of migrant children in Polish schools in the opinion of parents and primary school principals]. Edukacja Elementarna w Teorii i Praktyce, 18(3/70), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.35765/eetp.2023.1870.02
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies. 28. P. 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w.
Oleksiyenko, A., Terepyshchyi, S., Gomilko, O., & Svyrydenko, D. (2021). ‘What do you mean, you are a refugee in your own country?’: Displaced scholars and identities in embattled Ukraine. European Journal of Higher Education. 11 (2). P. 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1777446
Parchomiuk, M., Skrypnyk, A., & Kolesnyk, M. (2025). Understanding Ukrainian refugee students’ needs and challenges in Polish schools: Perspectives of the teaching staff.






