THE ESSENCE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF COMPETITION: PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/NPU-VOU.2024.2(93).04

Keywords:

competitiveness, intellectual competition, «su rplus knowledge», agony, selfsu rpassing, resentment

Abstract

Throughout his life, a person goes through a significant path of self-establishment and selfaffirmation. Its improvement depends on many factors. Starting with the improvement of one's own intellectual abilities, continuing with the increase in the level of physical skill, a person always takes steps towards his own «self-improvement». This total contribution to oneself and one's own development will be the measu re that a person is able to bring to the public platform and, thanks to it, enter into various forms of demonstration of one's own excellence, perfection or skill in any of the spheres of life. In this investigation, we intend to substantiate the princi ple of competition in the context of its philosophical understanding and to prove the fact that competition plays a significant role in the development of personality. In order to understand the specifics of this princi ple, it is necessary to dive into those forms of meaning that are concentrated in this almost metaphorically artifactual concept. This is due, for example, to the fact that competition is often reduced to the banality of rivalry. Therefore, there is a need to understand precisely the competitive characteristics and the foundation on which they grow. In modern society, competition is not the need of every person. Or the appearance that it has is far from exemplary, for example, the same ideal of agon. And so, if you understand the essence of this phenomenon, you can understand that a challenge in the form of a competition can be done only by a perfect person, or by someone who has a strong spirit and strives for self-improvement.

References

Дерріда, Ж. (2008). Божевілля економічної думки: дар без подарунку. Дарувати час. Львів: Літопис, С.45-87.

Забужко, О. (2020). Планета полин. Київ: Комора, 379 с.

Лютий, Т. (2017). Ніцше. Самоперевершення. Київ: Темпора, 872 с.

Ніцше, Ф. (2020). Шопенгауер як вихователь. Сутінки ідолів. Харків: Фоліо, 187 с.

Після філософії: кінець чи трансформація? (2000). Упоряд.: К. Байнес та інші. К.: Четверта хвиля, 2000. 432 с.

Acampora, Ch.D. (2002). Nietzsche Contra Homer, Socrates, and Paul. Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 24. Penn State University Press, pp. 25-53.

Bataille, G. (2005). La Sociologie Sacrée Du Monde Contemporain. Р: Lignes-Manifestes, 48 р.

Dictionary of Latin and Greek quotations, proverbs, maxims, and mottos, classical and mediaeval, including law terms and phrases. (1891). Вy Riley, Henry T. (Henry Thomas). Robarts: University of Toronto, 670 р. Електронна версія:URL:https://www.simardartizanfarm.ca/pdf/dictionaryoflati1891rileuoft.pdf

Nietzsche, F. (2007). Homer’s Contest. Genealogy of Morality. United States of America: Cambridge University Press, рр. 174-183.

Scheler, M. (1915). The phenomenology and sociology of ressentiment. Ressentimenton. Das ressentiment im aufbau der moralent. Translated by Louis A. Coser. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 126 p.

Published

2024-10-15

Issue

Section

EDUCATION PHILOSOPHY OF THE XXI CENTURI: SEARCH FOR PRIORITIES