LANGUAGE AS A FACTOR OF COMMUNICATIVE EFFECTIVENESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-VOU.2022.4(87).10Keywords:
socio-cultural conditioning of language, logic of language evolution, communicative effectiveness, criterion markers, semantic expressiveness of language means.Abstract
Relevance of the research topic. Since the main competitive advantage in the conditions of the information society is the quality and effectiveness of communication, the topic of language as a factor of communicative effectiveness acquires obvious relevance, which requires multi-aspect analysis. Formulation of the problem. The subject of research is characterized by a double problem: the first problematic aspect concerns the difficulties of an adequate and comprehensive theoretical representation of the spheres of language and communication as system objects; the second problematic format is due to the dependence of language and communication on the needs and interests of various subjects and socio-historical trends, which are extremely difficult to systematize, and even more so to reduce to a common criterion denominator. Analysis of recent research and publications. The understanding of language as a multi-aspect factor of communicative effectiveness, which functions in interaction with various socio-cultural aspects and trends, was carried out in the works of J. Sandoval, D. Kristin, O. Rafalskyi, Z. Samchuk and others. The populist megatrend of the functioning of the linguistic and communicative sphere of modern times is well-argued in the works of N. Parvini, Mudde C & Kaltwasser. The research direction of symbolic-metaphorical resources of language and communication of the modern format is associated with the works of R. Gibbs, A. Goatly, D. Grove, J. Littlemore, J. Rees, W. Sullivan. A characteristic feature of the communicative sphere of modernity is the use of language for the needs of tendency, bias, settlement of accounts, suggestion, manipulation, etc. A. Badiou, H. Byung-Chul, G. Cosentino, H. McDonald, and T. Rose are devoted to this aspect. However, despite the diversity of the thematic spectrum of language research as a factor of communicative effectiveness, there is a need to systematize and prioritize the factors underlying the evolution of language, as well as its functional tendencies and instrumental alternatives. Setting tasks. To study the language as a factor of communicative effectiveness through the prism of the logic of its evolution, as well as in the context of perspectives, trends and challenges of modernity. Presenting main content. The language as a factor of communicative effictiveness is understood through the prism of the logic of its evolution, functional trends and instrumental alternatives. The contradiction and controversy of the language of the postmodern era as a means of achieving different and often even incompatible target orientations of communication are analyzed. Conclusions. The comprehensiveness and persuasiveness of the study of language as a factor of communicative effectiveness depends on taking into account the etiological specificity of the subject of research, on the depth of understanding the logic of its evolution, as well as in the context of perspectives, trends and modern challenges. The correct interpretation of the functional-instrumental specificity of language as a factor of communicative effectiveness should take into account two research projections: the subject-object aspect and the essential format of means and goal, bearing in mind that under different circumstances language and the sphere of communication can be both an object , and the subject, both the means and the goal. Such status differences imply fundamentally different functional and instrumental requirements and means of their ensuring.
References
Висоцька, О. Є. (2009). Комунікація як основа соціальних перетворень (у контексті становлення постмодерного суспільства): монографія, Дніпропетровськ: «Інновація», 316 с.
Рафальський, О. О., Самчук, З. Ф. (2018). Цивілізаційні перехрестя сучасного суспільства. Київ: ІПіЕНД ім. І. Ф. Кураса НАН України, 688 с.
Badiou, A. (2022). The Immanence of Truths: Being and Event III, Bloomsbury Academic, 624 р.
Barthes, R. (1953). Le Degré zéro de l’écriture. Paris, Seuil, 192 р.
Bourdieu P. (1999). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press, 320 р.
Bredemeier, K. (2005) Schwarze Rhetorik. Macht und magie der sprache. Mit zahlreichen Übungen. Goldmann Verlag. 256 s.
Byung-Chul, H. (2022) Infocracy: Digitization and the Crisis of Democracy. Polity, 80 р.
Chase, S. (1959) The Tyranny Of Words. Harvest/HBJ. 420 р.
Cosentino, G. (2020) Social Media And The Post-Truth World Order: The Global Dynamics Of Disinformation. Palgrave Pivot. 151р.
Gibbs, R. W. (2017) Metaphor wars: conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press 328р.
Goatly, A. (1997) The Language of Metaphors : Literal Metaphorical. London & New York: Routledge. 376 р.
Kövecses, Z. (2006) Language, Mind, and Culture : A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press. 397 р.
Lepore, E., Smith, B. C. (2006) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. 1100 р.
Littlemore, J. (2019) Metaphors in the Mind : Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge University Press. 288 р.
Macdonald, H. (2018). Truth : How the Many Sides to Every Story Shape Our Reality. Bantam Press. 352 р.
Mudde, C. Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press. 136 р.
Parvini, N. (2022). The Populist Delusion. Perth: Imperium Press. 174 р.
Pinker, S. (2007). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. Harper Perennial Modern Classics. 576 р.
Rose, T. (2022). Collective Illusions: Conformity, Complicity, and the Science of Why We Make Bad Decisions. Hachette Go, 304 р.
Sandoval, J. B., Kristin D. E. (2021). Thinking like a Linguist: An Introduction to the Science of Language. Cambridge University Press, 248 р. 21. Sullivan, W. Rees, J. (2008). Clean Language: Revealing Metaphors and Opening Minds. Crown House Publishing, 160 р.