AESTHETIC CULTURE OF THE FUTURE TEACHER IN THE ERA OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/NPU-VOU.2026.1(100).08

Keywords:

aesthetic culture, future teacher, philosophy of education, artificial intelligence (AI), phenomenology, generative technologies, artistic and aesthetic worldview, aura of art, postmodern

Abstract

In the modern information society, the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies provokes a fundamental crisis of classical humanistic ideals and traditional understanding of artistic creativity. Algorithmic generation of aesthetic objects blurs the boundaries of authorship, transforms the authentic «aura» of a work of art and creates risks of depersonalization of spiritual space. In this context, the aesthetic culture of the future teacher acquires the status of a key mechanism for preserving human subjectivity. The system of higher pedagogical education is faced with an urgent need to modernize its approaches in order to teach future specialists ethical and critical interaction with the latest technologies without losing the existential depth of art. The purpose of the article is to provide a socio-philosophical and phenomenological understanding of the theoretical and methodological principles of the development of the aesthetic culture of future teachers in the context of the expansion of artificial intelligence and postmodern civilizational transformations. The study is based on a phenomenological approach to the analysis of the life world, a critical theory of modernity and the philosophy of technology. Methods of conceptual synthesis of domestic and foreign pedagogical experience in the field of general art education are applied. The impact of AI technologies on the architectonics of the modern educational space (the concept of «AI-driven classroom») is analyzed. It is proven that excessive algorithmization of the educational process carries the threat of emotional deafness and atrophy of critical thinking of higher education students. The transition from the classical “aura” of art to the algorithmic “semi-aura” is conceptualized, which requires updating the criteria for aesthetic evaluation. Ambivalence in the perception of generative AI by young students is revealed (from its perception as a tool for digital cocreation to a feeling of an existential crisis of professional identity). The need to integrate innovative technologies for the development of an artistic and aesthetic worldview directly into the process of studying professional disciplines is substantiated. It is established that aesthetic culture acts as a reliable safeguard against the dehumanization of education in the digital age. The task of a modern university is to create a safe space for creative reflection, where technologies function exclusively as a tool in the hands of a spiritually mature artistteacher. Maintaining a balance between machine efficiency and authentic human experience is the key to the harmonious development of the future intellectual elite.

References

Андрущенко, В. (2025). Просвітницька одіссея розуму. Київ: Знання України. 524 с.

Коновець, С. (2012). Теоретичні і методичні основи творчого розвитку майбутніх учителів образотворчого мистецтва у вищих навчальних закладах: дис. д-ра пед. наук : 13.00.04 / Коновець С. В. К. 471 с.

Лещенко, М. (1996). Зарубіжні технології підготовки учителів до естетичного виховання. 2-е вид., доп. К.: Гротеск. 192 с.

Масол, Л. (2006). Загальна мистецька освіта : теорія і практика. К.: Промінь. 432 с.

Музика, О. (2011). Розвиток творчих здібностей майбутніх учителів образотворчого мистецтва в процесі вивчення фахових дисциплін : дис. … кан. пед. наук : 13.00.04 / Музика Ольга Яношівна ; Уманський державний ун-т імені Павла Тичини. Умань. 300 с.

Перепелиця, О., Храброва, В. (2024). Освіта і університет в епоху штучного інтелекту. Філософія освіти. Т. 30, № 2. С. 186–198. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2024-30-2-12

Пирогова, Т. (2019). Проблема виховання естетичної культури майбутніх педагогів. Вища освіта України, № 1, C. 75–81.

Соломаха, С. (2013). Інноваційна технологія розвитку художньоестетичного світогляду викладачів до естетичного виховання мистецьких дисциплін. Проблеми освіти : наук. зб. / Ін-т інноваційних технологій і змісту освіти МОН України, Вип. 74. Ч. 1. С. 177–182.

Apostolescu, I., & Marino, S. (2022). Varieties of the lifeworld: Phenomenology and aesthetic experience. Continental Philosophy Review, 55, 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-022-09576-x

Bar-Gil, O. (2025). The transformation of artistic creation: from Benjamin’s reproduction to AI generation. AI & Society, 40, 6439–6453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02432-5

Feng, Y., & Xu, L. (2024). Modernity criticism of aesthetic education. Discover Education, 3, 124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00226-3

Jaramillo, J. J., & Chiappe, A. (2024). The AI-driven classroom: A review of 21st century curriculum trends. Prospects, 54, 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-024-09704-w

McLoughlin, J. (2024). The work of art in the age of artificial intelligibility. AI & Society, 40, 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01845-4

Salas Espasa, D., & Camacho, M. (2025). From aura to semi-aura: reframing authenticity in AI-generated art – a systematic literature review. AI & Society, 40, 6727–6759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02361-3

Wu, X., Tran, T. T. M., Zhou, Q., Sun, J., Wu, H., & Wang, X. (2026). Human-AI cocreation or conflict? Mapping art students’ diverse perspectives on creative identity with genAI: A Q methodology study. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13914-4

Published

2026-05-12

Issue

Section

INNOVATIVE SCIENCE AND MODERN EDUCATION