INCREASING STUDENTS' MOTIVATION AND INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS: PRODUCT APPROACHES AND THE ROLE OF COOPERATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/NPU-VOU.2025.4(99).10

Keywords:

motivation, students, learning process, team, teaching methods, innovation, technology

Abstract

The article presents the results of a comprehensive study conducted within the framework of the Double Diamond methodological model, which provided a systematic approach to analyzing the factors influencing students’ motivation and engagement in the learning process. The use of this model made it possible to consistently go through the stages of problem discovery, identification of key barriers, development of possible solutions, and their testing in the educational environment. The aim of the study was to explore the potential of applying UX/UI approaches and the principles of product thinking to enhance the effectiveness of educational interaction, particularly in the context of fostering collaboration skills and developing communication competencies. Through the joint work of the authors, it was established that one of the critical barriers to achieving highquality educational and research outcomes is the insufficient level of cooperation skills at the level of micro‑tasks. This issue is especially relevant for senior students and doctoral candidates, whose activities are characterized by a high degree of autonomy but simultaneously require the ability for productive communication, coordination of actions, and effective interaction in small working groups. The findings of the study demonstrated that the integration of product‑oriented approaches into the learning process contributes to: increasing the transparency and clarity of educational goals; improving the structuring of tasks and defining clear stages of their implementation; fostering a sense of shared responsibility for the final result; developing skills of facilitation, knowledge exchange, and reflection. Based on the obtained data, the necessity of incorporating a system of tangible communicative micro‑tasks into educational programs has been substantiated. These tasks are aimed at developing cooperation and teamwork skills. Such an approach allows combining the formation of professional competencies with the development of abilities that are critically important for research, project, and teaching activities. Moreover, it creates conditions for enhancing students’ motivation and engagement, promotes the formation of a culture of collaboration, and ensures the sustainability of educational outcomes in the long term.

References

Capillas, E. L., & Cancio, B. L. (2025). Enhancing Student Participation through Think-Pair-Share in Middle School Science Classes. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 41(10), 1169–1173.

Cook, D. A. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Fatmi, M., Hartling, L., Hillier, T., Campbell, S., & Oswald, A. E. (2013). The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30. Medical Teacher, 35(12), e1608-e1624. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.849802

Godes, J. K. C., Oledan, A. M. B., Luib, J. R. T., Saromines, C. J. C., & Gandamra, H. S. (2025). The Role of Mathematical Communication Through Think-Pair-Share in Developing Problem-Solving Skills. IJSES, 9(5), 93–97.

Hegde, S. B., & Babu, B. S. (2017). An Opportunistic AODV Routing Scheme: A Cognitive Mobile Agents Approach. IJASUC, 8(1/2/3), 1–15.

Kemikkıran, N., & Kızrak, M. (2022). Controlled Collaboration in Organizations: The Role of Knowledge Management, Performance and Trust. ARHUSS, 5(2), 156–181.

Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of Collaborative Learning. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091

Limniou, M., Durrani, Z., Hands, C., Duret, D., & Varga-Atkins, T. (2020). A Study for University Student Digital Capabilities, Independent Learning and the COVID-19 Lockdown Period. ICERI Proceedings.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Michaelsen, L. K., Sweet, M., & Parmelee, D. X. (Eds.). (2008). Team-Based Learning: Small-Group Learning’s Next Big Step (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 116). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation from a Self-Determination Theory Perspective: Definitions, Theory, Practices, and Future Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Scager, K., et al. (2016). Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Evoking Positive Interdependence. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0113

Van Dusen, B., & Otero, V. (2014). From Fear to Self-Expression: The Contextual Nature of Physics Student Motivations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.3794

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

HIGHER EDUCATION SCIENTIFIC PROJECTS